Facilitator: How did you become a clerk and how old were you?
Ian Moyler: Well, I left school at 16 years of age and I was working in the city in Temple Chambers, which is just outside the Temple. I was working at a place where you did company searches and I used to see lots of clerks buzzing around because it was quite a busy area just outside the Temple. Then I got a job, quite independently, at a firm of solicitors in Bishopsgate and I would come down to the Temple, Gray’s Inn and Lincoln’s Inn to deliver papers and instructions. And what happened was, I used to meet up with my old school mate, Clive Nicholls at a thing called the document exchange which is where you would deliver papers into a central box and people would re-distribute them. He wore this very, very smart grey suit and I was wearing a very awful brown suit, and I said to Clive, “How do you get the nice grey suits?” And he said, “Well, I’m a barrister’s clerk.” I said, “That sounds all right.” He said, “I know of have a job going at the moment.” The job was at 1, Essex Court. He said, “Go down there. They’re a very friendly bunch. When you go in, tell them that I sent you and explain you are there for the job.” So I trotted off to 1, Essex Court, to the first floor. Very old-fashioned buildings there. [I went] up the creaky stairs, walked in, and was greeted by the smell of coffee and Chanel perfume. It was a very nice warm, wood paneled room and it just felt so cozy in there. I saw a lady clerk called Rochelle Haring, and Geoffrey Maw was there as well. I explained very timidly that I had come for the job. Then I was ushered into another room and I was given an interview on the spot.
Facilitator: Do you remember the interview and what they asked you?
Ian Moyler: I explained that I went to court, dealt with lodging of documents at court, speaking to barrister’s clerks, speaking to barristers. At the law firm they even allowed me to go to conferences with barristers and take notes, which was highly ill-advised because I hadn’t a clue what I was doing. So I explained what my experience was, and at the end of the interview they explained to me that across the other side of the clerks room where I’d originally gone in there was a clerk who was going to go to Australia, but they didn’t know when he was to leave. It depended on when he got his travel documents through. Therefore, they said, “Thanks for coming in, but there isn’t a job here at the moment. But do pop in, and see how things go.” So after a year of going down to the Temple and popping my head round the corner every week, they finally told me that the junior clerk was going to Australia, and therefore the position had come up and they didn’t really want to interview anybody else because they felt sorry for me because I’d been in so often. I can’t remember the start date, but it must have been in 1983. So I’d left school in ’81, done about two years in the search company and solicitor’s office. Incidentally, when the solicitors found out I’d got a job as a barrister’s clerk, one of the partners there said, “You will never make it as a barrister’s clerk.” So that was a nice incentive to excel for me when I left the solicitors firm.
Facilitator: Did you know that they were specialised chambers?
Ian Moyler: I did know, but in the sense that at 18 years of age, you aren’t really aware of any of your surroundings apart from that you must get a document to court. I knew what they did, but it didn’t really register. I didn’t have any particular love for the law, I just thought it was a really cool place to work, because it was warm, and you didn’t have to sit in the office all day long. You could run around and you took people to court and you could meet some of your mates at lunch time. So it was a really good environment to work in. But in the first couple of months you got to see what people were doing and the quality of work they were undertaking and all sorts of big name brands coming through on the instructions. Coca-Cola, Lego, all wanting their trade marks protected or their rights protected.
Facilitator: Do you remember who was there when you arrived?
Ian Moyler: I remember John Burrell QC, I remember Christopher Morcom and Roger Wyand, David Mickletwaith, and a chap called Malcom Chappell. There was a lady barrister called Caroline Boone . But I think she was coming in as I was leaving. And there was a pupil barrister there called Frank Kindrid, who subsequently I’ve met, because he has gone on not to be a barrister but an in house lawyer at BT.
Facilitator: Was it shared with Common Law chambers?
Ian Moyler: Yes, this a really strange thing about chambers at that time . There was a corridor where if you went across the corridor you went across to the IP set and in the part of chambers where Geoff (Maw), Rochelle and I sat, that was the Common Law / Criminal chambers. So they did a bit of civil work but they were really prosecuting and defending on what’s called the Thames Valley circuit. So it was a lot of criminal work. It was really unusual position because the IP barristers were highly successful and they did really well and Geoff was very wedded to them because, no doubt, he made good money from the IP people. But on the other hand, the civil people were doing poorly paid prosecutions and legal aid defence briefs in the Crown Courts of the Thames Valley.
Facilitator: I think Roger Wyand told me that he was once sent one to a juvenile court so they were also sharing arrangements at some point when there was nobody available.
Ian Moyler: I wasn’t aware of that, but I could imagine that would have happened. So for me it was really busy on one side of the chambers because the Crown Court and the Civil Courts were really busy with cases coming in and coming out all the time. The other side was far more relaxed because IP people really are truly intellectual people and you could instantly tell that there was a difference in the make-up of the barristers in the IP set.